Comparing Mnemonics and Jigsaw Learning

Summary of Okenyi (2024)

Background & Existing Knowledge

Mathematics achievement remains a challenge due to ineffective instructional methods. Mnemonics and Jigsaw* techniques offer alternative approaches to improve learning outcomes.

New Insights from This Study

✔ The Jigsaw instructional method is more effective than mnemonics for improving math achievement.
✔ Mnemonics still provide benefits for memory retention in mathematics.
✔ Interactive and cooperative learning strategies significantly enhance student performance.

Practical Applications: How Educators Can Use This Research

1. Interdisciplinary Lesson Planning
   📌 Combine mnemonic strategies with Jigsaw techniques for mathematics instruction.
   📌 Use memory aids to reinforce key mathematical formulas.
   📌 Implement collaborative learning structures in math lessons.

2. Creating Inclusive Classrooms
   📌 Support peer teaching through Jigsaw group activities.
   📌 Adapt mnemonic strategies for students with different learning needs.
   📌 Encourage students to develop personalized mnemonic devices.

3. Developing Psychomotor Skills
   📌 Use movement-based mnemonic activities for math learning.
   📌 Integrate role-playing exercises to enhance numerical understanding.
   📌 Reinforce mathematical concepts through interactive games.

Conclusion

Jigsaw techniques outperform mnemonics in math achievement, but both strategies offer benefits for improving retention and engagement.

* The Jigsaw technique is a cooperative learning strategy where students become "experts" on a specific topic, share their knowledge with others, and then work together to synthesize information, fostering teamwork and deeper understanding.

Reference
Okenyi, E. C. (2024). Improving Pupils’ Achievement in Mathematics: A Comparative Study of Mnemonics and Jigsaw Instructional Techniques. International Journal of Studies in Education, 20(2), 170-180​.

Suggested Citation
Ross, E. M., & Malar, D. B. J. (2025). Comparing Mnemonics and Jigsaw Learning. Excellent Educator, 2(6), 4.